Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K. Babu, J
VIJAYAN P.P – Appellant
Versus
M./ VASANTHA LAKSHMI – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. respondent-husband is doing business (Para 4) |
| 2. respondent resisted the application (Para 5) |
| 3. family court jointly tried (Para 6 , 7) |
| 4. learned counsel for the respondent (Para 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 5. the court emphasized the duty (Para 14) |
| 6. revisional powers are not to be equated (Para 15) |
| 7. the impugned order is not affected (Para 16) |
ORDER
The Challenge in this Revision Petition (Family Court) is to the order dated 30.11.2017 in M.C.No.306/2012 passed by the Family Court, Malappuram, under Section 125 of the Cr.P.C.
2. The respondent-husband is the revision petitioner. The petitioner in MC.No.306/2012 is the respondent herein. The Parties will be referred to as per their status in the Trial Court.
3. The petitioner filed an application under Section 125 of Cr.P.C. seeking maintenance. The petitioner pleaded that she has no source to survive. She is depending upon her brother for her livelihood. Her parents are no more.
4. The respondent-husband, is doing business in the UAE. He is conducting a building material shop. He is also engaged in real estate business. The average monthly income of the respondent is Rs.3,00,000/- per month. Considering the living stan
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
