HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Sathish Ninan, P. V. BALAKRISHNAN, JJ
H.ARUN KUMAR ALVA – Appellant
Versus
SMT.GEETHA MOHANDAS SHETTY – Respondent
JUDGMENT
P.V.BALAKRISHNAN, J
RFA No.443/2018 is filed by the defeated defendants 1 to 5, 7 & 8 challenging the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.17/2016 by the Sub Court Kasargod. RFA No.445/2018 is filed the non suited plaintiffs 1 to 5, 7 & 8, aggrieved by the judgment and decree passed in O.S.No.20/2015 by the Sub Court, Kasargod.
2. O.S. No. 20/2015 is a suit for partition and O.S.No.17/2016 is a suit for specific performance. Both suits were jointly tried by the trial court, by taking O.S.No.17/2016 as the leading case. The plaintiffs in O.S.No.20/2015 are defendants 1 to 8 in O.S.No.17/2016. Defendants 2 to 5 in O.S.No.20/2015 are the siblings of defendant No.1 and they are not parties in O.S.No.17/2016. The 6th defendant in O.S.No.20/2015 is the husband of the 2nd defendant, and he is is the 9th defendant in O.S.No.17/2016. It is the 2nd defendant in O.S.No.20/2015 who is the plaintiff in O.S.No.17/2016.
3. These suits pertain to a dispute between two branches of a family, one among them being the legal heirs of Sumathi Naik and Sadashiva Naik and other being the legal heirs of Muthakke Alva and Santha Alva.
4. Plaintiff in O.S.No.17/2016 belongs to the branch of Sumathi Naik
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.