SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(KER) 49960

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
RISMAL.K.P – Appellant
Versus
KERALA BANK – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: ANILKUMAR V.
For the Respondents: M.SASINDRAN

Table of Content
1. borrower's inability to repay due to a pandemic. (Para 2 , 3 , 4)
2. bank's rights to execute loans upon default. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
3. court's discretion in allowing time for repayment. (Para 9 , 10)
4. formal conclusion on petitioners' repayment terms. (Para 11)

J U D G M E N T

Dated this the 31st day of January, 2024 The petitioners have approached this Court aggrieved by the coercive proceedings for recovery of financial advance made by the Kerala State Co-operative Bank to the petitioners, invoking the provisions of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act , 2002.

2. The 1st petitioner had availed Personal Loan and a Housing Loan. The petitioners state that though the petitioners made remittances promptly during the initial repayment period of the financial advance, they could not pay the repayment instalments promptly later due to Covid-19 pandemic. The repayment of loans fell into arrears. It happened due to reasons beyond the control of the petitioners.

3. Though the petitioners requested the Bank to permit the petitioners to repay the overdue amounts in easy monthly instalments, the Bank authorities were

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top