SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 60289

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
RATHEESH – Appellant
Versus
V.S.MARY – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A. BADHARUDEEN TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2023 / 14TH BHADRA, 1945 RSA NO. 838 OF 2020 AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 20.12.2019 IN AS 21/2017 ON THE FILE OF THE SUB COURT, ATTINGAL AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 30.06.2017 IN OS NO.115/2013 OF MUNSIFF COURT, ATTINGAL APPELLANT/APPELLANT/DEFENDANT:

RATHEESH AGED 49 YEARS S/O. KARUNAKARAN, RATHEESH FLOWER MART, KILIMANOOR, PAZHAYAKUNNUMMEL PANCHAYATH, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 304 BY ADV K.SIJU RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT/PLAINTIFF:

V.S.MARY AGED 68 YEARS D/O. VELAYUDHAN, S.N.V SADANAM, KILIMANOOR, PAZHAYAKUNNUMMEL VILLAGE, CHIRAYINKEEZHU TALUK, THIRUVANANTHAPURAM 695 304 BY ADV SRI.LATHEESH SEBASTIAN THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL HAVING COME UP FOR ORDERS ON 05.09.2023, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

CR

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 5th day of September, 2023 This regular second appeal has been filed under section

100 of the Civil Procedure Code (hereinafter referred to as 'CPC' for short) and the appellant is the defendant in O.S.No.115/2013 on the files of the Munsiff 's Court, Attingal. The appellant is aggrieved by

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top