J U D G M E N T

A.Muhamed Mustaque, J.

Ext.P6 order speaks in volume of chaos in using inappropriate nouns. The order starts as follows:

“The Original Petition is filed by the respondent/petitioner who is herein after referred to as the petitioner against the petitioner/respondent who is hereinafter referred to as the respondent.”

2. It is difficult now to understand to whom the custody of the child is given, as the operative portion directs the petitioner to hand over the child to the respondent. The father says that the order was in his favour and the mother says that the order was in her favour. Syntax should be simple. Instead of confusing with these kind of nouns, after referring to the status of the parents, the Family Court could have directed to hand over the child by one parent to the other. Anyway, on much strain, we are now able to gather what was intended by the Family Court. The direction was to hand over the child from the custody of the father to mother.

3. The parties are present today. We direct the father to hand over the child forthwith to the mother and the father will have weekend custody on every Saturdays from 10.00 a.m. till 5.00 p.m. on ensuing Sundays, and als