Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
S.MANIKUMAR, CJ, Murali Purushothaman, J
SAJU THURUTHIKUNNEL – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. coastal regulation zone notification context (Para 2) |
| 2. arguments raised by the petitioner (Para 3) |
| 3. counter arguments from the respondents (Para 4 , 5) |
| 4. statements and justifications by officials involved (Para 7 , 8 , 9) |
| 5. legal backing and notifications referenced (Para 10 , 11) |
| 6. legislative framework for coastal regulation (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 7. procedures regarding crz and requirements (Para 15 , 16 , 17 , 18) |
| 8. alleged allotment of land and petitioner's claims (Para 19 , 20 , 21) |
| 9. delay and laches in legal proceedings (Para 22 , 23) |
| 10. findings and conclusions on the legality of actions (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 11. final judgment and dismissal of writ (Para 30) |
JUDGMENT
S. Manikumar, CJ
Instant Public Interest Litigation is filed by the petitioner for the following reliefs:
(i) Declare that 3 acres of land in Sy. No.843 of Ernakulam Village, described as puzha puramboke in the basic tax register maintained by the Village authorities, as reclaimed portion of backwaters, in the year 2000, as a part of Manaveeyam program by the State Government is under classification CRZ-II Zone, as defined under Coastal Regulation Zone Notification , 2011 and deve
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
