SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 10865

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
N.P ABDUL NAZER – Appellant
Versus
UNION BANK OF INDIA (ERSTWHILE CORPORATION BANK) – Respondent


Advocates:
Maria Nedumpara, ASP.KURUP, C.N.PRABHAKARAN

JUDGMENT

The original petitioner is a borrower from the erstwhile Corporation Bank, which has now merged with the Union Bank. An overdraft cash credit facility taken in the year 2011, the quantum of which was subsequently enhanced, was defaulted by the borrower. Proceedings were initiated by the bank under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 (for short 'the SARFAESI Act'). By the impugned order dated 16.05.2022, the Chief Judicial Magistrate appointed an Advocate Commissioner to take possession of the secured asset under Section 14 (1) of the SARFAESI Act.

2. This writ petition was filed only on 28.03.2023, challenging Ext.P3 order dtd. 16.05.2022. After the hearing was completed, it was noticed that petitioner had filed an amendment petition, which was not brought to the notice of the court, though arguments were addressed entirely on that basis. The case was therefore posted again, and the amendment petition was allowed. All the learned counsel were again heard. In the amended writ petition, eleven new reliefs were sought. A few of the reliefs sought in the amended writ petition are as follows:-

a. Declare that t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top