IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
RAHUL CHANDRAN R.B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
ORDER
This bail application is filed under section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short ‘ BNSS ’).
2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.944 of 2025 of Kilimanoor Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram, registered for the offences punishable under sections 78 and 77 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short, 'BNS') and Section 66E and 67A of the Information Technology Act, 2000 (for short, 'IT Act').
3. According to the prosecution, the accused had, after becoming acquainted with the defacto complainant stalked her and made video calls and recorded her nude videos and transmitted the same to other persons and thereby committed the offences alleged.
4. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner as well as the learned Public Prosecutor.
5. Petitioner is alleged to have compelled the defacto complainant to engage in a video call and forced her to disrobe herself and thereafter took the videographs and circulated the same to others.
6. Considering the nature of allegations, I am of the view that though Sections 78 and 77 of BNS are bailable offences, Section 67A of the IT Act is a non-bailable offence. Taking note of the seriousness of the allegations
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.