SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 21335

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K. Babu, J
ANU P. SATHEESAN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
M.T.SURESHKUMAR, SREELAKSHMI SABU, PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT M K PUSHPA LETHA

ORDER

The petitioner is accused No. 2 in C.C.No.101 of

2017 on the file of the Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Pathanamthitta. She faces charges under Sections 419, 420, 465, 468 r/w Section 34 of IPC. On receipt of the summons, the petitioner appeared before the Court. During the course of the trial, the petitioner got a job offer in Kuwait. The petitioner filed an application under Section 205 of Cr.P.C. seeking exemption from appearance in the Court and to permit her to be represented through a lawyer.

2. The trial Court rejected the application submitted by the petitioner as per Annexure-A4. The petitioner challenges the dismissal of the application under Section 205 Cr.P.C. in this proceeding.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the presence of the petitioner during the course of trial is not at all required in view of the nature of the charges levelled against her. The learned counsel further submitted that the petitioner is prepared to undertake that she would not dispute her identity, a counsel on her behalf would be present in the Court and that she has no objection in

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top