SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 21773

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
A. BADHARUDEEN, J
VISWANATHAN P, – Appellant
Versus
MOHANAKRISHNAN – Respondent


Advocates:
R.RANJANIE R.LAKSHMI NARAYAN

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 4th day of October, 2023 This Execution Second Appeal has been filed under Section 100 r/w Order XXI Rule 58(4) and Rule 103 of the Code of Civil Procedure (for short, 'the C.P.C.' hereinafter) by the 4th petitioner in E.A.No.70/2021 in E.P.No.661/2017 in O.S.No.95/2012.

2. Respondents herein are the other petitioners, decree holder and judgment debtor.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the appellant on admission.

4. The appellant assails order in E.A.No.70/2021 on the files of the Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode, dated 2.9.2021 and judgment passed by the learned Additional District Judge, Kozhikode in A.S.No.59/2021, dated

24.7.2023, arose therefrom.

5. On perusal of the order and judgment under challenge, passed in a petition filed under Order XXI Rule 97 to 100 of the C.P.C., the case of the petitioners, who are the legal heirs of late Raghavan Nair was that, after the death of Raghavan Nair, the entire properties, where statutory charge under Section 55 (6)(b) of the Transfer of Property Act , 1882 (for short, ‘the TP Act’ hereinafter) was alleged to be created, devolved upon the petitioners. Further case is that, 1/7 share of the judgment debtor was transferre

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top