SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 1345

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
MARY JOSEPH, J
JOJO SCARIA – Appellant
Versus
M.V JOSEPH (PAPPACHAN) – Respondent


Advocates:
ADV.ARUN CHANDRAN, SRI.P.C.HARIDAS, SRI. DENNY DEVASSY

JUDGMENT

The appeal on hand is originated from a judgment passed by Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Pala (for short ‘the trial court’) in S.T.No.774/2016, which is a prosecution launched by the appellant under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act , 1881 (for short ‘the NI Act’). By the judgment referred to, the trial court found the accused not guilty of the offence punishable under NI Act and acquitted him under Section 255 (1) of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973 (for short ‘Cr.P.C’). He was set at liberty after cancelling the bail bond executed by him.

2. The facts of the case in brief are narrated hereunder:

The complainant is the son-in-law of the accused. The accused borrowed a sum of `30,00,000/- from the complainant for meeting the travelling expenses of his son.

Towards the discharge of the said liability, the accused had drawn a cheque on Federal Bank Ltd., Aruvithura Branch for that amount and issued to the complainant on 07.08.2011. The borrowal of the amount as well as the issuance of the cheque were taken place at the residence of the complainant. The cheque was presented by the complainant for collection through State Bank of India, Pala Branch, but

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top