SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 5648

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V.KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
SRI. ABDUL SATHAR – Appellant
Versus
BHAVAS S/O.RASHEED – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.C.RAJENDRAN

JUDGMENT

This writ petition is filed with the following prayers:

“i) To call for the records made into Exhibits P2 order and set aside the same and to allow Exhibit P1 petition.

ii) To give a direction to the 2nd respondent to dispose of the case within a time frame fixed by this Hon’ble Court.

iii) To grant such other reliefs this Hon’ble court may deem fit and proper in the interest of justice.”

2. The petitioner is the applicant in WCC No.21/2008 on the file of the 2nd respondent. Respondent No.1 is the opposite party. Petitioner filed the above petition under the Employees Compensation Act, 1923 claiming a compensation amount of Rs.3,00,000/- for the injuries sustained to him on 31.03.2005 at

9.a.m., while he was was working as a sand worker.

3. The applicant was examined as AW1 and he was cross examined by the opposite party. The applicant produced six(6) documents which were marked as Exts.A1 to A6. Thereafter the case was adjourned to 29.08.2009. On that day the petitioner and the 2nd respondent were absent. Subsequently, the case was adjourned to 11.06.2011 and 05.01.2011. On those days also the petitioner and the 1st respondent were absent. On 05.01.2011, the case was dismisse

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top