Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
BASANT BALAJI, J
NASEEMA BEEVI DAUGHTER OF ABIDA BEEVI – Appellant
Versus
AMEER SHAHUL @ AMEER P.S. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiff filed suit claiming compensation. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. defendants argue nisamol was employed as a maid. (Para 4) |
| 3. trial court returned plaint due to jurisdiction issues. (Para 5) |
| 4. appellant argues jurisdiction based on effect of death. (Para 6 , 7) |
| 5. respondents assert new delhi jurisdiction is proper. (Para 8) |
| 6. territorial jurisdiction includes effect of the act. (Para 10 , 12) |
| 7. court determines jurisdiction and orders trial. (Para 11 , 13) |
JUDGMENT
(Dated this the 3rd day of October, 20223)
The plaintiff in O.S. No. 100 of 2004 on the files of the Sub-
Judge, Nedumangad is the appellant and the respondents were the defendants therein. The suit was filed claiming compensation of Rs.3,00,000/- together with future interest at the rate of 18 %
p.a from the defendants and their assets.
The brief facts necessary for the disposal of this appeal are as follows:-
2. The plaintiff is the mother of the deceased Nisamol who passed away on 02.06.2001 in New Delhi at the residences of defendants 1 and 2. She is residing in Lekshamveedu colony having no means of her own other than 4 cents of property and has small building thereon. The plaintiff is a chronic heart patie
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
