SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 25434

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
DHANDAPANI.M – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
L.RAJESH NARAYAN

ORDER

This Crl.MC is filed to quash the proceedings in S.T.No.161/2021 on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court-III, Palakkad. The above case is charge sheeted against the petitioner alleging offences punishable under Section 279 IPC and Sections 146 and 196 of the Motor Vehicles Act .

2. According to the petitioner, even if the entire allegations are accepted, the offence is not made out. The counsel for the petitioner also relied on Annexure A4 to A8 to substantiate the prosecution will not stand. The petitioner also submitted Annexure A9 before the learned Magistrate under Section 258 Cr.PC. The same is also not considered. Hence, this Crl.MC is filed.

3. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

4. After hearing both sides, I think this Crl.MC need not be retained here because the crime was registered in the year 2021 and S.T was registered by the learned Magistrate in the year 2021. Since the petitioner already filed a petition to drop the proceedings as evident by Annexure A9, there can be a direction to consider the same and there can be a direction to the learned Magistrate not to insist the presence of the petitioner t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top