SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 932

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
SEBASTAIN – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
M.VIVEK; K.K.DHEERENDRAKRISHNAN; N.P.ASHA; P.NARAYANAN, SR.GP & ADDL PP

C O M M O N O R D E R

The same points are raised in these Criminal Miscellaneous Cases and therefore, I am disposing of these cases by a common order. The main point to be decided in these cases is, when the court invokes Sec.53B of the Abkari Act (for short 'the Act'), the court needs to decide the question, whether prima facie, the confiscation of a vehicle as per the Act is necessary for the purpose of directing the execution of a bond by way of cash security for releasing the vehicle or whether it can be exempted if the court finds that, prima facie confiscation of the vehicle as per the Act is not necessary.

2. I will narrate the facts in Crl.M.C. No. 9469/2023 first. The petitioner is arrayed as accused in Crime No. 39/2023 of Thiruvananthapuram Excise Range, Thiruvananthapuram District alleging offences punishable under Sec. 55(a), 55H and 67B of the Act. The crime was registered on the basis of a search conducted at the residence of the petitioner by which 38.940 litres of beer and 10.250 litres of Indian Made Foreign Liquor are alleged to be seized from the house. Annexure-I is the seizure mahazar in Crime No. 39/2023 of Thiruvananthapuram Excise Range. During the course

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top