SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 3695

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AMIT RAWAL, J
ALIYAMMA IPE – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY MANARCAUD GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.R.VENUGOPAL, SRI.DOMSON J.VATTAKUZHY, SRI.MATHEW JOHN K

JUDGMENT

Petitioners had been running poultry pig and diary farm since

2011 and had obtained the licence from the concerned Grama Panchyath under the then relevant and applicable bye law/Act, Rules. In 2011, an application for renewal of licence for the period 2012-13 was submitted. But during the pendency of the same, Grama Panchayth issued a notice in respect of a complaint of local residents, though the details of the same was not given. The aforementioned notice was duly replied but again a notice Ext.P4 was received, which was also replied with the same reply of being not satisfactory. An appeal was preferred before the second respondent which was rejected much less revision, which also has been dismissed.

2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that, in the meantime, Livestock Farm Rules had come into force with effect from 13.4.2012. The aforementioned Rules, permit the person to carry on the Farm, if the number of the cattles do not exceed 5, goat 20 and Pigs 5. Owing to the COVID pandemic there has been a considerable reduction of the animals. The authorities cannot keep the application for renewal of the licence in the manner or holding any enquiry

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top