SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 31813

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
JYOTHI – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI.D.KISHORE, SMT.MINI GOPINATH,19Advocate

ORDER

Can an appeal filed by a victim under the proviso to Sec.372 of the Code of Criminal Procedure (Code, in brief)

be dismissed for default ?

Relevant facts

2. The prosecution allegation is that the second respondent - the husband of the revision petitioner – was a habitual drunkard. On 2.12.2006, he assaulted the revision petitioner. The Poonthura Police registered crime No.297/2006 against him for the offence under Sec.498(A) of the Indian Penal Code. The Police after investigation laid the final report before the Court of the Judicial Magistrate of First Class -V, Thiruvananthapuram in CC No.1138/2008. The learned Magistrate, after analyzing the materials on record, acquitted the accused. Aggrieved by the said judgment, the revision petitioner filed Crl.A No.254/2013 before the Court of Session, Thiruvananthapuram. The Appellate Court, by the impugned order, dismissed the delay petition and consequentially the appeal on the ground that there was no representation for the revision petitioner.

3. Aggrieved by the orders, the present revision petition is filed.

4. Heard; Sri.D.Kishore, the learned Counsel appearing for the revision petitioner; Smt.Seetha S., the learned Public Pros

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top