SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 22415

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
Farhan – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl.MC 7253 2023



Advocates:
SHAJIN S.HAMEED

A petition for exemption under Sec. 205 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable during the active investigation of a case.

Headnote:

Bail - Criminal Procedure - IPC Sections 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 308, 149 - The court confirmed that a petition under Sec. 205 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable during investigation, suggesting alternative procedures upon filing of a final report.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioner, accused in a criminal case, sought permission to leave Kerala after being granted pre-arrest bail with conditions. His requests for exemption were denied by both the Magistrate and Sessions Court.

Finding of the Court:

The court upheld the lower courts' decisions, indicating that an application under Sec. 205 Cr.P.C. is not sustainable while the investigation is active, but allowed the petitioner to file a new application once the final report is submitted.

Issues: Whether a petition for exemption under Sec. 205 Cr.P.C. can be maintained during the investigation stage.

Ratio Decidendi: The court established that under the prevailing legal framework, a Sec. 205 Cr.P.C. petition is impermissible until the completion of the investigation, thus confirming the lower court’s judgments.

Final Decision: The petitioner may file a new application upon the submission of the final report for permission to travel abroad.

O R D E R

The petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No. 336/2023 of Varkala Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram. The above case is registered alleging offences punishable under Secs. 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 308 r/w Sec.149 IPC . He was granted pre-arrest bail by the lower court as per Annexure-B order. As per condition No. 6 in Annexure-B order, the petitioner was refrained from leaving the State of Kerala without prior permission. The petitioner filed an application under Sec. 205 Cr.P.C. for exemption before the Magistrate Court. That was dismissed as per Annexure-C order. The petitioner also approached the Sessions Court with the same prayer and that was also dismissed as per Annexure-D order.

2. After going through Annexures-C and D orders, I am of the considered opinion that what the lower court said is correct. An application under Sec. 205 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable when the case is under investigation. Now, the petitioner submitted that the final report is filed before the court concerned. If that is the case, the petitioner can file a fresh petition and if such a petition is filed, there can be a direction to consider the application.

Therefore, this Crl.M.C. is disposed of with the following directions :

1) The petitioner is free to submit an application for getting permission to go abroad for a limited period within two weeks from the date of receipt of a certified copy of this order.

2) Once such an application is received, the learned Magistrate will consider the same and pass appropriate orders in it after giving an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and Prosecutor concerned as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within two weeks from the date of receipt of the application.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top