HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. B. Suresh Kumar, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ
VENGOLI KUNHIKRISHNAN
– Appellant
Versus
PULIYANTHARKUNI BALAN – Respondent
O R D E R
P.B.Suresh Kumar, J.
The tenant in a proceedings for eviction under the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 (the Act) has instituted this revision petition. Though the Rent Control Court dismissed the eviction petition, the said decision was reversed by the Appellate Authority. It is aggrieved by the said decision of the Appellate Authority that the tenant has come up in this revision petition.
2. After arguing the matter for quite some time, having convinced that the arguments raised on behalf of the petitioner are not acceptable to the court, the learned counsel for the petitioner prayed for indulgence for a longer time to surrender vacant possession of the premises which is the subject matter of the proceedings to the respondent, on the premise that it is difficult to find out an alternative premises for running the business carried on by him in the tenanted premises.
3. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case as also the orders passed in similar and identical revisions, the rent control revision is disposed of granting nine months' time from today to the petitioner to surrender vacant possession of the premises on condition that he shall
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.