SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 183

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P.V. KUNHIKRISHNAN, J
Farhan – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
ADV SHAJIN S.HAMEED

O R D E R

The petitioner is the 4th accused in Crime No. 336/2023 of Varkala Police Station, Thiruvananthapuram. The above case is registered alleging offences punishable under Secs. 143, 147, 148, 294(b), 341, 323, 324, 308 r/w Sec.149 IPC. He was granted pre-arrest bail by the lower court as per Annexure-B order. As per condition No. 6 in Annexure-B order, the petitioner was refrained from leaving the State of Kerala without prior permission. The petitioner filed an application under Sec. 205 Cr.P.C. for exemption before the Magistrate Court. That was dismissed as per Annexure-C order. The petitioner also approached the Sessions Court with the same prayer and that was also dismissed as per Annexure-D order.

2. After going through Annexures-C and D orders, I am of the considered opinion that what the lower court said is correct. An application under Sec. 205 Cr.P.C. is not maintainable when the case is under investigation. Now, the petitioner submitted that the final report is filed before the court concerned. If that is the case, the petitioner can file a fresh petition and if such a petition is filed, there can be a direction to consider the application.

Therefore, this Crl.M.C. i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top