IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 14TH POUSHA,
1944
OP (CAT) NO. 179 OF 2018
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA 569/2014 OF CENTRAL
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH
PETITIONERS/REPONDENTS IN OA:
1
UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT
OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,
NEW DELHI
2
THE FLAG OFFICER COMMANDING IN CHIEF
HEADQUARTERS, SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI-04.
3
CHIEF STAFF OFFICER (P & A)
HEADQUARTERS, SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI-04.
4
THE DIRECTOR
PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (NAVY)
(PAY SECTION), NO.1 COOPERAGE ROAD,
MUMBAI-400 001.
BY ADVS.
SRI.T.V.VINU, CGC
RESPONDENTS:
ALL INDIA NAVAL CLERKS ASSOCIATION
REPRESENTED BY THE GENERAL SECRETARY,
ALL INDIA NAVAL CLERKS ASSOCIATION,
DOOR NO. 39/3293C/2ND FLOOR,
K.S.N MENON ROAD,
KOCHI 682016
T.M.MATHEW,
S/O T.J.MATHAI, LOWER DIVISION CLERK,
NAVAL SHIP REPAIR YARD,
NAVAL BASE,
KOCHI-682004.
3
K.B.SHAJI
S/O LATE K.K.BHASKARAN,
HEADQUARTERS,
SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI-04,
KALLUMADATHIL HOUSE,
NJARAKKAL P.O., MANJANAKKAD,
ERNAKULAM-682505.
4
SANTHA GOPINATH
OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT,
NAVAL SHIP REPAIR YARD,
NAVAL BASE P.O., KOCHI-4,
KOZHAKKARAPPILLIL HOUSE,
RAMAMANGALAM P.O.,
ERNAKULAM-686663.
5
C.U.MOLLY
W/O SABU P.ABRAHAM,
OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT,
INS VENDURUTHY, NAVAL BASE,
KOCHI-682004.
6
P.ELIZABETH
W/O D.THIMOTHIYOS,
OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT,
MATERIAL ORGANIZATION,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI 682004,
PANIKKAVEETTIL VADAKKETHIL,
P.O.PALLIPPADU,
ALEPPEY DISTRICT.
7
K.J.MARY MARGERET
W/O K.J.MATHEW,
OFFICE SUPERINTENDENT,
INS GARUDA, HEADQUARTERS,
SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI-682004.
P.KUNJAMBU
S/O K.GOVIND, ASSISTANT,
INS GARUDA, SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI-682004.
BY ADVS.
SRI.S.RADHAKRISHNAN
SHRI.S.RAJMOHAN
SMT.R.ANJALI
SRI.ADITYA THEJUS KRISHNAN
THIS OP (CAT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.01.2023, ALONG WITH OP (CAT).52/2019, THE COURT ON
THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
PRESENT
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE A.K.JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR
&
THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE MOHAMMED NIAS C.P.
WEDNESDAY, THE 4TH DAY OF JANUARY 2023 / 14TH POUSHA,
1944
OP (CAT) NO. 52 OF 2019
AGAINST THE ORDER/JUDGMENT IN OA 271/2014 OF CENTRAL
ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL,ERNAKULAM BENCH
PETITIONERS/RESPONDENTS IN OA:
1
UNION OF INDIA
REPRESENTED BY THE SECRETARY TO THE GOVERNMENT
OF INDIA, MINISTRY OF DEFENCE,
NEW DELHI.
2
SECRETARY
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA, DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL
AND TRAINING,
NEW DELHI.
3
FLAG OFFICER, COMMANDING IN CHIEF
SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI - 682 004.
4
CHIEF STAFF OFFICER
SOUTHERN NAVAL COMMAND,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI - 682 004.
5
PRINCIPAL CONTROLLER OF DEFENCE ACCOUNTS (NAVY)
NO.1, COOPERAGE ROAD,
MUMBAI - 400 001.
BY ADV K.SUDHINKUMAR
RESPONDENTS/APPLICANTS IN OA:
COCHIN NAVAL BASE CIVILIAN WORKERS UNION(AIDEF)
39/4472-E2, 3RD FLOOR,
PEGREE MALL, OPP. MEDICAL TRUST HOSPITAL,
PALLIMUKKU, KOCHI - 682 016,
REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, K.K.BALACHANDRAN,
S/O.M.KESAVAN NAIR, AGED 51 YEARS,
CHARGEMAN (PLATER), NSRY, NAVAL BASE,
KOCHI - 682 004, RESIDING AT KOTTARAPPILLY
HOUSE, VELLARAPILLY SOUTH P.O.,
ALUVA, ERNAKULAM - 683 580.
2
K.K.BALACHANDRAN
S/O.M.KESAVAN NAIR, AGED 51 YEARS,
CHARGEMAN(PLATER), NSRY,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI - 682 004,
RESIDING AT KOTTARAPPILLY HOUSE,
VELLARAPILLY SOUTH P.O.,
ALUVA, ERNAKULAM - 683 580.
3
K.M.GEORGE
S/O.K.P.MATHAI, AGED 55 YEARS,
MACHINIST MASTER, CRAFTSMAN,
NSRY, NAVAL BASE, KOCHI - 682 004,
RESIDING AT KANJANPPILLY HOUSE,
VYTILLA, KOCHI - 682 019.
4
BABY PAUL
S/O.K.C.PAUL, AGED 53 YEARS,
ICE FITTER MASTER, CRAFTSMAN, NSRY,
NAVAL BASE, KOCHI - 682 004,
RESIDING AT KALLUNGAL HOUSE,
MULANTHURUTHY P.O., KARIKODE - 682 314.
BY ADVS.
SRI.M.R.HARIRAJ
SRI.K.RAJAGOPAL
SMT.L.LAKSHMI OMANAKUTTAN
THIS OP (CAT) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON
04.01.2023, ALONG WITH OP (CAT).179/2018, THE COURT ON THE
SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
A.K. JAYASANKARAN NAMBIAR & MOHAMMED NIAS C.P
., JJ
…...................................................
OP(CAT)Nos.179 of 2018 & 52 of 2019
…..............................................................
Dated this the 4th day of January, 2023
PAY FIXATION - REVISED PAY STRUCTURE - [KEYWORD] - The existing basic pay as on 01.01.2006 is the pay drawn in the prescribed existing scale of pay and that it can only be interpreted as the pay applicable to the post payable to the Government servants as on 01.01.2006, because the pay in the old scale had ceased to exist on 01.01.2006 and a new pay scheme systematically different from the old scale of pay had come into force on that day.
Fact of the Case:
The respondents were working in different grades of the Ministerial cadre in the Indian Navy. The Assistants were drawing a pay scale of Rs.5000-8000 and the Office Superintendents were drawing a pay scale of Rs.5000-9000 under the 5th Central Pay Commission (CPC). On implementation of the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP Scheme), the LDCs and the UDCs were granted their second and first financial upgradation and were placed in the scale of pay of Assistants at Rs.5000-8000 (pre-revised) when they were granted the second and the first financial upgradations respectively. However, after the 6th central Pay Commission the two posts carrying the pay of Rs.5000-8000 and Rs.5500-9000 were clubbed together and placed in the revised pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 by way of merger in Pay Band 2 (PB2) with grade pay of Rs.4200/-.
Finding of the Court:
The Tribunal by the order impugned found relying on Rule 7 of the CDS (RP) Rules, 2008 and also the definition of 'existing basic pay' and 'existing scale' that a conjoint reading of the above will reveal that the existing basic pay as on 01.01.2006 is the pay drawn in the prescribed existing scale of pay and that it can only be interpreted as the pay applicable to the post payable to Government servants as on 01.01.2006, because the pay in the old scale had ceased to exist on 01.01.2006 and a new pay scheme systematically different from the old scale of pay had come into force on that day.
Ratio Decidendi: The existing basic pay as on 01.01.2006 is the pay drawn in the prescribed existing scale of pay and that it can only be interpreted as the pay applicable to the post payable to the Government servants as on 01.01.2006, because the pay in the old scale had ceased to exist on 01.01.2006 and a new pay scheme systematically different from the old scale of pay had come into force on that day.
Final Decision: Accordingly, we dismiss these original petitions.
ORDER
Mohammed Nias.C.P., J.
The Union of India and its officials have filed these original petitions aggrieved by the orders passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT), Ernakulam Bench allowing the applications filed by the respondents herein that quashed Annexures A1 and A2 orders and held that the respondents are entitled to get their initial pay fixed treating Rs.6500/- as existing basic pay as on 01.01.2006 with all consequential benefits..
2. The relevant facts leading to the original petitions are as follows:-
The respondents were working in different grades of the Ministerial cadre in the Indian Navy. The Assistants were drawing a pay scale of Rs.5000-8000 and the Office Superintendents were drawing a pay scale of Rs.5000-9000 under the 5th Central Pay Commission (CPC). On implementation of the Assured Career Progression Scheme (ACP Scheme), the LDCs and the UDCs were granted their second and first financial upgradation and were placed in the scale of pay of Assistants at Rs.5000-8000 (pre-revised) when they were granted the second and the first financial upgradations respectively. However, after the 6th central Pay Commission the two posts carrying the pay of Rs.5000-8000 and Rs.5500-9000 were clubbed together and placed in the revised pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 by way of merger in Pay Band 2 (PB2) with grade pay of Rs.4200/-. Annexure A3 circular dated 5.4.2010 was issued by the Ministry of Defence making it clear that the said order will take effect from 01.01.2006.
3. The applicants grievance was about the manner in which the initial pay was fixed in the revised pay structure in accordance with the the Civilians in Defence Services (Revised Pay) Rules, 2008 (hereinafter referred to as 'the Rules 2008'). They contended that their pay has been wrongly fixed by the petitioners in the revised pay scales taking the pay drawn before the implementation of the merger of posts as their basic pay as on 01.01.2006. Their essential contention is that the pre-revised scale is not the scale before the merger but it is the scale after the merger but before the revision of the scales by the 6th CPC, and therefore, the pre-revised scale specified in Annexure A8 OM can only be the pay scale after the merger which came into force with effect from 01.01.2006. Thus, the applicants prayed for a declaration that the fixation of initial pay in the revised pay structure as per Rules 7 of the CCS (RP) Rules, 2008 should be based on the salary actually due as on 01.01.2006 and to fix their salary in the revised pay scale of Rs.6500-10500 as on 01.01.2006 with all consequential benefits.
4. The petitioners contended before the Tribunal that Annexure A1 and A2 communications reflected the correct position and the procedure to be a dopted in all cases wherein pay scale have been explained with an illustration sample case. It was their contention before the Tribunal that existing basic pay means the pay drawn in the prescribed existing scale of pay and since the applicants have never drawn pay in the scale of Rs.6500-10500, the contention of the applicants could not have been accepted.
5. The Tribunal by the order impugned found relying on Rule
7 of the CDS (RP) Rules, 2008 and also the definition of 'existing basic pay' and 'existing scale' that a conjoint reading of the above will reveal that the existing basic pay as on 01.01.2006 is the pay drawn in the prescribed existing scale of pay and that it can only be interpreted as the pay applicable to the post payable to Government servants as on 01.01.2006, because the pay in the old scale had ceased to exist on 01.01.2006 and a new pay scheme systematically different from the old scale of pay had come into force on that day. Accordingly, the original applications were allowed and Annexures A1 and A2 communications in OP(CAT) 179 of 2018 were set aside and it was declared that the respondents should fix the initial pay of the applicants including all members of the Applicant No.1 Association i
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.