SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Ker) 16479

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM
V.G.ARUN, J
SATHEESHKUMAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
Crl.MC 10325/2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: B.MOHANLAL, P.S.PREETHA, ASWIN V. NAIR, KARTHIK J SEKHAR, ABIJITH M., AVANI NAIR, JAYAPRABHA, ARJUN, PRAVEENA T.
For the Respondents: SRI. C.S.HRITHWIK

The reliance on vague evidence and printed witness statements cannot sustain criminal charges under the Kerala Police Act.

Headnote:This judgment involves the interpretation of Sections 119(1)(a) of the Kerala Police Act, 2011. The petitioner, sole accused in C.C No.55 of 2019, is alleged to have made sexual gestures in public. The court determined that specific actions were not described, thus invalidating the offense. The judgment emphasizes that reliance on printed formats for witness statements is untenable under prior case law (Jayakrishnan P. v. State of Kerala [2024 (5) KHC 615]). The court held that due to the deficiencies in the investigation, the proceedings were quashed as there was insufficient evidence to sustain the charges.

Result: The Crl.M.C is allowed, quashing all proceedings against the petitioner.

Table of Content
1. court finds investigatory deficiencies invalidating proceedings. (Para 4)

ORDER

Petitioner is the sole accused in C.C No.55 of 2019 pending on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Kollam. The case originated from Crime No.74 of 2019 registered at the Kollam West Police Station for the offence punishable under Sections 119 (1)(a) of the Kerala Police Act , 2011. The crime was registered on the allegation that on 28.01.2019 at 20.10 hours, the petitioner was found making sexual gestures in a public place, thereby degrading the dignity of women.

2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that a vague and omnibus statement that the petitioner was seen making sexual gestures, without specifying what exactly was the gesture, is not sufficient to attract the offence. It is also contended that the mahazar, First Information Statement, statements of the witnesses and Final Report are in printed formats, indicating non-application of mind and a pre-decision to implicate the petitioner. Reliance is placed on the decision of this Court in Jayakrishnan P. v. State of Kerala [ 2024 (5) KHC 615 ] to point out that the practice of preparing of 161 statements in printed formats has been strongly deprecated by this Court.

3. I heard the learned Public Prosecutor also.

4. As rightly contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner, except stating that the petitioner was found making sexual gestures in a public place, what exactly was the gesture is not seen stated. Moreover, preparation of statements by filling up blanks in printed formats has been deprecated by this Court in Jayakrishnan P. (supra). As held therein, printed formats used as part of investigation cannot be relied on and it indicates non-application of mind by the Investigating Officer. Over and above these infirmities, the fact that the investigation officer itself was the complainant, leaves this Court with no alternative than to quash the proceedings.

In the result, the Crl.M.C is allowed and all further proceedings in C.C No.55 of 2019 pending on the files of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court II, Kollam, against the petitioner, quashed.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top