SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 188

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. G. Ajithkumar, J
SHAILA VINCENT – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
M.SHAJU, PURUSHOTHAMAN, K.S.RAJESH

JUDGMENT

Petitioner is the de-facto complainant in Crime No.1434/2021 registered by Kodungallur Police alleging offences punishable under Sections 406 , 419, 420, 465 and 467 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code . The grievance of the petitioner is that even though Ext.P1 was registered on 01/12/2021, there is no investigation conducted by the Station House Officer, Kodungallur and his subordinates. Now 1½ years elapsed. Even now the investigation is in a stand still. Hence this writ petition is filed for issuing a direction to the 2nd respondent to handover the investigation in Ext.P1 FIR to the 5th respondent District Crime Branch.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor.

3. After hearing both sides, I am of the considered opinion that the 2nd respondent should call for the case diary in this case and either he himself or an officer deputed by him should peruse the same and if there is any irregularity on the part of the Investigating Officer, there can be a direction to entrust the investigation to a Senior Police Officer.

Therefore, this writ petition (criminal) is disposed of in the following manner.

1. The 2nd respondent is directed to

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top