JUDGMENT

The appeal is filed by the defendant in a suit for money based on a promissory note. The Trial Court had initially decreed the suit, which ultimately was considered by this Court in RSA No.226/2010 . The decree of the Trial Court and the appellate court were set aside, since the same were based on the conduct of the defendant in not sending a reply to the lawyer notice sent on behalf of the plaintiff. This Court remanded the matter for fresh consideration with opportunity to the parties to adduce additional evidence and had also opined that the more appropriate course open to the plaintiff was to get expert opinion on the disputed signature in Ext.A1. After remand, the document was sent for expert's opinion and the expert submitted a report. Thereafter, the suit was again decreed relying on the opinion of the expert and all other attending evidence. The appeal filed by the appellant herein was dismissed confirming the decree of the trial court. It is in the above circumstances that the second appeal has been filed. The main ground put forward by the counsel for the appellant is that the opinion of the expert does not categorically say that the disputed document has been si