Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.K. SURENDRAN – Appellant
Versus
KUNHIMOOSA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. facts of the case surrounding the recovery of license fee. (Para 2) |
| 2. legal standards and interpretation of admission under order xii rule 6 c.p.c. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. possibility of passing decree on admission. (Para 5) |
| 4. jurisdictional considerations regarding commercial disputes and courts. (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 5. interpretation of commercial dispute and application of statutory definitions. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 6. final orders and directions for the trial court. (Para 13) |
ORDER
These revision petitions are against the two orders passed by the trial court in a subsequent suit in O.S.No.61/2021 by the plaintiff. The subject of C.R.P.No.68/2023 is the order passed rejecting an application to pass a decree on admission under Order XII Rule 6 C.P.C by the trial court. C.R.P.No.134/2023 is against the order dismissing an application for attachment before judgment in that suit.
2. The application submitted by the plaintiff in I.A.No.1/2023 in O.S.No.61/2021 is for getting a decree under Order XII Rule 6 C.P.C. based on the admission in the written statement submitted by the defendant. The suit is admittedly for recovery of licence fee based on agreement for licence. The arrear
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
