SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8660

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
BINOY – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI. NIREESH MATHEW

ORDER

The revision petitioner is the accused in S.C.No.438 of 2006 on the file of the Assistant Sessions Judge, Kattappana alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 8 (1) and (2) of the Abkari Act .

2. The prosecution case is that the Excise Inspector of Peermade Range, accompanied by the Preventive Officer and other officials while conducting patrol duty at around 4.00 p.m on 24.1.2004, nearby the T.R & T Estate situated at Chennapparamukal kara in Peruvanthanam Village, found out the accused transported around 15 litres of arrack in a 35 litres volumed plastic can. He was arrested from the place and seized the contraband article from the possession of the accused.

3. On the side of the prosecution, PWs.1 to 5 were examined and Exts.P1 to P8 and MO1 were marked.

4. The trial court on consideration of the evidence adduced found that the accused is guilty of the charges levelled against him and he was convicted and sentenced to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of 5 years and to pay a fine of Rs.1,00,000/- and in default of payment of fine, to undergo simple imprisonment for a period of one year.

5. Aggrieved by the said conviction and sentence, an appeal was prefer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top