SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 9302

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
K. Babu, J
RAGESH A.K – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
HALVI K.S.

O R D E R

The prayer in this Crl.M.C. is to quash Annexure A2 Final Report in Crime No.630/2018 of Kunnamkulam Police Station, and all further proceedings in C.C.No.324/2019 on the file of the Judicial First Class Magistrate Court, Kunnamkulam on the ground that the parties have arrived at a settlement in respect of the subject matter.

2. The petitioners are the accused.

3. The offences alleged against the petitioners are punishable under Sections 341 and 323 r/w Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code and Section 75 of the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act .

4. Respondent No.3, the defacto complainant entered appearance through counsel. An afÏdavit sworn to by him has also been placed before this Court.

5. Heard both sides.

6. I have perused the averments in the petition and the afÏdavit sworn to by respondent No.3.

7. The learned Public Prosecutor, on instructions, submitted that the matter was enquired into through the Investigating OfÏcer, who has taken statement of the defacto complainant, and it is reported that the dispute between the parties has been amicably settled. The material placed before the Court shows that the entire dispute between the parties has been

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top