HIGH COURT OF KERALA
AMIT RAWAL, C.S. Sudha, JJ
AJITH KUMAR.M.K – Appellant
Versus
PRASEETHA AJITH – Respondent
J U D G M E N T
C.S.Sudha, J.
This petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India has been filed challenging the order dated 20/02/2021 in O.P.Nos.58/2018 and 460/2018 on the file of the Family Court, Pathanamthitta. O.P.No.58/2018, that is Ext.P1, has been filed by the respondent herein/wife seeking return of gold ornaments from the petitioner herein/husband. O.P.No.460/2018, that is Ext.P2, has been filed by the husband seeking a decree of permanent prohibitory injunction against the respondents therein who are his wife and in-laws from trespassing into the plaint schedule property or interfering with his peaceful possession of the same.
2. Both the aforesaid cases were ordered to be jointly tried.
O.P.No.58/2018 filed by the wife is seen to have been taken as the main case in which evidence has been recorded. After the close of the evidence of the respondent/wife, the matter was posted for the evidence of the petitioner/husband, who filed a proof affidavit in lieu of chief examination along with several documents to be brought in evidence. The contents of the affidavit was objected to on behalf of the respondent/wife on the ground that they were not confined to the facts
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.