SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2023 Supreme(Online)(KER) 2283

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Devan Ramachandran, J
CLEETUS S. J – Appellant
Versus
UNION OF INDIA – Respondent


Advocates:
B.J.JOHN PRAKASH, P.PRAMEL, ALTHEA EDWINA ROZARIO, COLIN ALEX, SOORAJ M.S.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 11th day of December, 2023 The petitioner says that his son was implicated in a case relating to carrying a narcotic substance in Kuwait, while he travelled to the said country for employment; and that this was done by the master brain of the crime, a certain Sri. Antony. He says that his son is now serving sentence in Kuwait for no crime he has committed; and therefore, that he preferred Ext.P1 complaint before the competent authority, seeking an investigation into the illegal acts of to the aforementioned Sri. Antony. He thus prays that respondents 2 and 3 be directed to investigate Ext.P1, so that his son can invoke legal remedies in Kuwait, to exonerate himself. He further pleads that the 1st respondent - Union of India be directed to offer his son all legal assistance, as is required, to obtain a release from his incarceration in Kuwait, at the earliest.

2. Sri.Sunil Kumar Kuriakose, learned Government Pleader, in response to the afore assertions of the petitioner, as made by his learned counsel – Sri. John Prakash B.J., submitted that Ext.P1 has already been taken cognizance and a Crime registered against the aforementioned Sri. Antony. He pointed out t

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top