HIGH COURT OF KERALA
GOPINATH P, J
M.K.YACOB – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The petitioner has approached this Court being aggrieved by the fact that despite the finding by the 3rd respondent that there was a mistake in the resurvey conducted in so far as it relates to the property of the petitioner (as is evident from Ext.P3), the necessary corrections in the resurvey sketch have not been carried out for want of No Objection Certificate from the 2nd respondent Panchayat.
2. The 3rd respondent has filed a counter affidavit wherein, in paragraph 5, it is states as follows:- “5. It is submitted that the land was inspected and records were examined by the Taluk Surveyor and such examination revealed that in Re-Survey records, Road Puramboke (Re.sy.No.133/14) is situated in the western part of the petitioner's property (Re.Sy No.133/16). A clear boundary existed between the property of the petitioner (133/16) and Road Puramboke (133/14). At the time of the preparation of the resurvey records, the R-Survey officials drew the boundary line between the existing clear boundary. Because of this error, some extent of property of the petitioner was wrongly included in Re-survey No.133/14 as road puramboke land. For correcting this mistakes surveyor prepared a
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.