SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 35930

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
C.S. DIAS, J
MUJEEB RAHMAN – Appellant
Versus
HASEENA.V. – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The original petition is filed aggrieved by Exhibit P9 passed by the sole Arbitrator in A.R.C No.112/2019 under Section 16 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (in short ‘Act’), ruling that he has the jurisdiction to adjudicate the claim petition.

2. The skeletal facts relevant for the determination of the original petition are:

(i) The petitioner is the respondent in A.R.C No.112/2019, filed by the respondent before the sole Arbitrator. The petitioner and the respondent had entered into Exhibit P1 deed of partnership. The respondent had filed O.S No.64/2017 (Exhibit P2) before the Court of the Subordinate Judge, Kozhikode, alleging that the petitioner had to pay him an amount of Rs.17,50,000/-. The petitioner appeared in the suit and filed I.A No.1781/2017, under Sec.8 (1) of the Act, contending that in view of Clause 17 (e) of Exhibit P1 deed of partnership, the parties had agreed to resolve their disputes through arbitration. Hence, the suit was not maintainable. The civil court, by Exhibit P3 order, allowed the application and by Exhibit P4 judgment referred the parties to arbitration.

(ii) The respondent approached this Court and filed A.R No.112/2019 to appoi

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top