SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 38585

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
BECHU KURIAN THOMAS, J
RAJEESH – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


Advocates:
VISHNU BHUVANENDRAN, ANUSREE, RESHMA UNNIKRISHNAN, MIRAL K.JOY

ORDER

This is an application seeking regular bail filed under Section

439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , 1973.

2. Petitioner is the accused in Crime No.870/2021 of Mannar Police Station, Alappuzha District. The offences alleged against the petitioner are under sections 302, 397 & 201 of the Indian Penal Code. 1860.

3. According to the prosecution, petitioner murdered the deceased after committing theft of the gold earrings and thereby committed the offences alleged.

4. Sri.Vishnu Bhuvanendran, learned Counsel for the petitioner contended that the entire prosecution allegations are false and the incident as alleged had not occurred. It was further submitted that petitioner was arrested on 10.11.2022 and he has been in custody since then. It was also pointed out that no purpose would be achieved by continuing the detention of the petitioner.

5. Sri.K.A.Noushad , learned Public Prosecutor opposed the grant of bail and contended that the allegations against the petitioner are serious and even though the case is now pending trial as S.C.No.512/2021 before the Sessions Court, Mavelikkara, there is every chance that the petitioner may intimidate/influence the witnesses.

6. I have consider

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top