SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 38276

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
VIJU ABRAHAM, J
RON ELLICKAL – Appellant
Versus
THE SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE – Respondent
Bail Appl./8984/2022



Advocates:
BENOY K.KADAVAN

Anticipatory bail can be granted to individuals with no criminal record when they are willing to cooperate with investigations, despite serious allegations.

Headnote:

Bail - Anticipatory Bail - IPC Sections 353, 34; Motor Vehicles Act Section 184 - The court considered the allegations of obstruction to official duty and potential arrest, granting anticipatory bail with stringent conditions for cooperation with the investigation.

Fact of the Case:

The petitioners faced allegations of pushing a police officer and speeding away during a vehicle stop while on patrol. They requested anticipatory bail, expressing willingness to cooperate with the investigation.

Issues: Whether anticipatory bail should be granted in light of allegations of obstructing police duty.

Ratio Decidendi: The court emphasized the presumption of innocence and the importance of cooperation during investigations, concluding that bail was appropriate given the petitioners' background and lack of criminal history.

Final Decision: Anticipatory bail granted with conditions.

ORDER

Application for anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioners are accused in Crime No.1103 of 2022 of Central Police Station, Kochi City registered alleging commission of offences punishable under Sections 353 and 34 of IPC and Section 184 of the Motor Vehicles Act .

3. The prosecution allegation is that, while the defacto complainant was on patrolling duty, the accused pushed the police man and left the place at high speed.

4. The petitioners submit that they have been now served with a notice under Section 41A of Cr.P.C as evident from Annexures-1 & 2. Petitioners submit that they are ready and willing to co-operate with the investigation and they apprehend arrest in connection with the alleged crime.

5. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Public Prosecutor.

6. The learned Public Prosecutor upon instructions submitted that while the police officials was on patrol duty the vehicle in which the petitioners were travelling was asked to stop and the police officials while talking to the 1st accused, the 1st accused pushed the defacto complainant and took away the car at high speed, and thus they have obstructed the official duty of the police officials. The learned Public Prosecutor further submitted that the petitioners have no other criminal antecedents.

Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, and nature of the allegations, and taking into consideration the petitioners are students and that they have no other criminal antecedents, I am inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners, but on stringent conditions. The above bail application is allowed with the following directions. The petitioners shall surrender before the investigating officer on 16.11.2022 and make themselves available for interrogation on that day or on any other day/days and time as directed by the investigating officer. The petitioners shall co- operate with the investigation. In the event of arrest of the petitioners in Crime No.1103 of 2022 of Central Police Station, they shall be produced before the jurisdictional Magistrate on the same day and be released on bail on the following conditions:

(i) The petitioners shall execute a bond for sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) each with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the jurisdictional Court;

(ii) The petitioners shall appear before the investigating officer in Crime No.1103/2022 of Central Police Station on every Saturday at 11.00 am, until filing of final report;

(iii) The petitioners shall co-operate with the investigation and make themselves available for interrogation whenever so required;

(iv) The petitioners shall not tamper with any evidence;

(v) The petitioners shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any witness acquainted them from disclosing such facts to the court or to any police officer;

(vi) The petitioners shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the Investigating Officer in Crime No.1103/2022 of Central Police Station, may file an application before the jurisdictional court for cancellation of bail.

It is made clear that it is within the power of the police to investigate the matter and if necessary to effect recoveries on the information if any given by any of the petitioners even when the petitioners are on bail as per the judgment of the Apex Court inSushila Aggarwal and others v. State (NCT of Delhi) and another ( 2020 (1) KHC 663 ).

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top