SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 54399

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
N. NAGARESH, J
JAYASREE C.S – Appellant
Versus
THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER – Respondent


Advocates:
V.M.KRISHNAKUMAR, P.R.REENA, P.S.SIDHARTHAN, MAYA M.

JUDGMENT

Dated this the 16th day of September, 2022 The petitioner along with her daughter is the owner of

1.02 Acres of land in Pazhayakunnummel Village of Chirayinkeezhu Taluk in Thiruvananthapuram District. The petitioner has filed this writ petition seeking to direct the 1st respondent to consider and pass orders on Ext.P3 application within a time frame to be fixed by this Court.

2. The petitioner states that she along with her daughter is the owner of 1.02 Acres of land situated in Re-survey No.57/4-2-1 of Pazhayakunnummel Village, Chirayinkeezhu Taluk in Thiruvananthapuram District. The land is a garden land. It is not cultivated with paddy. It is not fit for paddy cultivation either. However, the land is included in the Data Bank and is described as paddy land in Revenue records also.

3. The petitioner wants to use the land for other purposes. Hence, the petitioner filed Ext.P3 application in Form-5, invoking Rule 4(d) of the Kerala Conservation of Paddy Land and Wetland Rules, 2008. The application was filed on 08.06.2022. The application is not disposed of so far. Unless the application is considered expeditiously, the petitioner will be put to untold hardship and loss, conte

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top