SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 60518

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL K.NARENDRAN &

THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE P.G. AJITHKUMAR TUESDAY, THE 5TH DAY OF APRIL 2022 / 15TH CHAITHRA, 1944 O.P.(RC) NO. 84 OF 2022 TIME BOUND DISPOSAL OF BRC(OP) NO.6 OF 2020 ON THE FILE OF THE RENT CONTROL COURT (MUNSIFF), KARUNAGAPPALLY PETITIONER:

ANSEED, AGED 45 YEARS, S/O. THANGAL KUNHU, CHETTISSERY HOUSE, MIDAPALLY MURIYIL, PANMANA P.O., PANMANA VILLAGE, KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN – 691583.

BY ADV K.RAKESH RESPONDENT:

KUNHUMUHAMMED AGED 65 YEARS, SAJI NIVAS, KINARUVILAYIL, MIDAPALLY MURIYIL, PANMANA VILLAGE, PANMANA P.O., KARUNAGAPALLY TALUK, KOLLAM DISTRICT, PIN – 691583.

THIS OP (RENT CONTROL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON

05.04.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

JUDGMENT

Anil K. Narendran, J.

The petitioner filed BRC(OP) No.6 of 2020 before the Rent Control Court (Munsiff), Karunagappally under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965, seeking eviction of the respondent herein-tenant from the petition schedule shop room. The grievance of the petitioner is the delay in disposal of BRC(OP) No.6 of 2020. In that matter, the Rent Control Court ordered notice to the tenant and posted the case to 23.10.2020. Thereafter, the case was posted on 10.12.2020, 21.01.2021, 27.02.2021, 28.05.2021, 15.07.2021, 11.10.2021, 20.12.2021 and 19.02.2022. Now, the case is listed to 24.05.2022. The tenant has not yet filed any counter affidavit. The tenant has also defaulted payment of rent. The learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that a time bound consideration of the BRC(OP) No.6 of 2020 is highly essential.

2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner-

landlord. Considering the nature of the relief proposed to be granted, service of notice on the respondent-tenant is dispensed with.

3. The Rent Control Petition filed by the landlord seeking eviction of the tenant under Section 11(2)(b) and 11(3) of the Act is one filed in the year 2020. According to the landlord, the tenant has defaulted payment of rent.

3. Section 12 of the Act deals with payment or deposit of rent during the pendency of proceedings for eviction. As per Section 12(1), no tenant against whom an application for eviction has been made by a landlord under Section 11, shall be entitled to contest the application before the Rent Control Court under that Section, or to prefer an appeal under Section 18 against any order made by the Rent Control Court on the application, unless he has paid or pays to the landlord, or deposits with the Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority, as the case may be, all arrears of rent admitted by the tenant to be due in respect of the building up to the date of payment or deposit, and continues to pay or to deposit any rent which may subsequently become due in respect of the building, until the termination of the proceedings before the Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority, as the case may be. As per Section 12(2), the deposit under sub-section (1) shall be made within such time as the court may fix and in such manner as may be prescribed and shall be accompanied by the fee prescribed for the service of notice referred to in sub-section (4). As per the proviso to Section 12(2), the time fixed by the court for the deposit of the arrears of rent shall not be less than four weeks from the date of the order and the time fixed for the deposit of rent which subsequently accrues due shall not be less than two weeks from the date on which the rent becomes due. As per Section 12(3) of the Act, if any tenant fails to pay or to deposit the rent as aforesaid, the Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority, as the case may be, shall, unless the tenant shows sufficient cause to the contrary, stop all further proceedings and make an order directing the tenant to put the landlord in possession of the building. As per Section 12(4), when any deposit is made under sub-section (1), the Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority, as the case may be, shall cause notice of the deposit to be served on the landlord in the prescribed manner, and the amount deposited may, subject to such conditions as may be prescribed, be withdrawn by the landlord on application made by him to the Rent Control Court or the Appellate Authority in that behalf.

4. The liability of a tenant under Section 12(1) of the Act, against whom an application for eviction has been made by a landlord under Section 11, or who prefer an appeal under Section 18 of the Act, against any order made by the Rent Control Court on an application made by a landlord under Section 11, is limited to all arrears of rent admitted by the tenant to be due in respect of the building, up to the date of paymen

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top