SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 53515

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
DINESH M.B – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


ORDER

These are applications for regular bail.

2. Petitioners in these cases are accused Nos.6, 8, 5 and

12 respectively in Crime No.249/CB/TSR/D/21 of Crime Branch Thrissur registered under Sections 406, 420, 409, 465, 468 and 471 of the Indian Penal Code. The allegations against the petitioners in these cases is that they were Board members of the Karuvannur Service Co-operative Bank at different points of time and that they had conspired with officials of the Bank to sanction loans to fictitious persons or ineligible borrowers using security documents produced by other genuine customers of the Bank. 3. The learned counsel for the petitioners in these cases would submit that the petitioners in these cases were all board members of the aforesaid Bank and they have no direct role in the sanctioning of loans. It is also submitted that this Court has already granted bail to similarly placed persons, through orders in Bail Application Nos.9703 of 2021, 9889 of 2021, 9877 of 2021, 10012 of 2021, 10017 of 2021, 10004 of 2021 and 10020 of 2021. It is the submission of the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners that the petitioners in these cases are not differently placed from the pe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top