JUDGMENT

Shaji P. Chaly, J.

The above appeal is preferred by the petitioner in W. P. (C) No. 17966 of 2022 challenging the judgment dated 03.06.2022 passed by the learned Single Judge whereby the following reliefs sought for in the writ petition were declined:-

“A. To issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction commanding the respondents to erect appropriate sign boards specifying the speed limits applicable in stretch of roads owned and managed by the respondents 1 to 8;

B. To issue appropriate directions and guidelines to the 1st respondent to make it mandatory to install speed limiting mechanisms or such other alerting devices in the vehicles plying in the public road for the proper implementation of directives enshrined in S.112 of the Motor Vehicle Act as provided under Exhibit P5;

C. To call for the records leading to Ext P2 to P3 and such other further communications may be pleased to issue a writ of certiorari to quash the same.”

2. Brief material facts for the disposal of the appeal are as follows:-

3. Appellant is the registered owner of a motor car. He is served with Exts. P2 and P3 charge memos by the Inspector of Police, High- Tech Traffic Enfo