Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ
SAUMYA M.S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. challenge to prior verdict by original application. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. eligibility as a member of the bar post-suspension. (Para 4 , 19) |
| 3. details of petitioner's legal career and employment history. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. interpretation of statutes and rules regarding legal practice. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. final ruling on non-eligibility for position due to suspension. (Para 21) |
JUDGMENT
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
The final verdict rendered by the Division Bench of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram Bench on 5.5.2021 in the instant original application, O.A.No. 880/2020 is under challenge before us in the instant Original Petition filed under Arts.226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.
2. The sole petitioner in the Original Petition is the sole applicant in the O.A. and the respondents in the OP are the respondents in the O.A..
3. Heard Sri.N.Asok Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the O.P./sole applicant in the O.A., Sri.Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned Senior Govt. Pleader appearing for respondents 1 & 2 in the O.P./R-1 & R-2 in the OA, Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala Public Service Commission appearing for R
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
