SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 8572

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ
SAUMYA M.S – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent
OP(KAT) NO. 39 OF 2022



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: N.ASHOK KUMAR
For the Respondents: SRI.SAIGI JACOB PALATTY, SRI.P.C.SASIDHARAN, SRI.NIRMAL V.NAIR

A government employee who voluntarily suspended legal practice cannot qualify as a member of the Bar for appointment as Assistant Public Prosecutor.

Headnote:(A) Advocates Act, 1961 - Sections 2, 30, 33, 35, 41 - Bar Council of India Rules, Rule 49, Rule 5 - Eligibility for appointment as Assistant Public Prosecutor - A government employee who has voluntarily suspended practice as an Advocate cannot be treated as a member of the Bar for the purpose of selection. (Paras 4, 21)

(B) The court concluded that the applicant does not retain the legal right to practice as an Advocate after voluntary suspension while in government service. (Para 21) Facts of the Case: The applicant secured a law degree and enrolled as an Advocate but later suspended her practice to take up government employment, challenging eligibility for a legal post.

Findings of Court:
The court affirmed that the suspension of practice affects eligibility, and the applicant cannot be recognized as a member of the Bar under the relevant rules.

Issues: Whether a serving government employee, who suspended legal practice, qualifies as a 'member of the Bar' for government job eligibility.

Ratio Decidendi: The court ruled that suspension of practice prohibits the retention of membership in the Bar, concluding the applicant is not eligible for the position sought.

Result: The petition is dismissed.

Table of Content
1. challenge to prior verdict by original application. (Para 1 , 2)
2. eligibility as a member of the bar post-suspension. (Para 4 , 19)
3. details of petitioner's legal career and employment history. (Para 5 , 6)
4. interpretation of statutes and rules regarding legal practice. (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 13 , 14)
5. final ruling on non-eligibility for position due to suspension. (Para 21)

JUDGMENT

ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.

The final verdict rendered by the Division Bench of the Kerala Administrative Tribunal, Thiruvananthapuram Bench on 5.5.2021 in the instant original application, O.A.No. 880/2020 is under challenge before us in the instant Original Petition filed under Arts.226 and 227 of the Constitution of India.

2. The sole petitioner in the Original Petition is the sole applicant in the O.A. and the respondents in the OP are the respondents in the O.A..

3. Heard Sri.N.Asok Kumar, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner in the O.P./sole applicant in the O.A., Sri.Saigi Jacob Palatty, learned Senior Govt. Pleader appearing for respondents 1 & 2 in the O.P./R-1 & R-2 in the OA, Sri.P.C.Sasidharan, learned Standing Counsel for the Kerala Public Service Commission appearing for R-3 in the O.P/R-3 in the O.A. and Sri.Nirmal V.Nair, learned Advocate appearing for contesting respondents 4 to 7 in the O.P./R-4 to R-7 in the O.A.

4. The main issue posed before us in this OP is as to whether a serving Government employee, who had earlier secured enrollment as an Advocate in terms of the provisions contained in the Advocates Act, and who had later suspended his legal practice for taking up the above Government employment, can be treated as a “member of the Bar” for the purpose of selection and appointment as Assistant Public Prosecutor Grade II. Our answer to the abovesaid issue is in the negative and thus against the petitioner in the OP. The reasonings for arriving at the abovesaid conclusion will be dealt with hereunder. The original petitioner herein/original applicant will be referred for convenience as “the applicant”. The respondent Kerala Public Service Commission will be referred for convenience as “PSC”.

5. A brief reference to the factual aspects in this case would be pertinent and relevant. According to the applicant, she had secured a degree in law from the University of Calicut and thereafter she had duly got herself enrolled as Advocate before the Bar Council of Kerala on 30.12.2007, in terms of the provisions contained in the Advocates Act, 1961 and the rules framed thereunder. According to her, she has commenced practice as an Advocate in the courts at Alappuzha, including the criminal courts there. Later she got appointment as Lower Division Typist (LDT) in the Excise Department of the Government of Kerala and pursuant to the said appointment order, she has joined Government service as LDT on 16.10.2012. It is also her admitted case that before that, she had given the requisite application before the Bar Council of Kerala and had got her legal practice suspended in terms of the provisions contained in the Advocates Act and the Bar Council of India Rules and that the abovesaid voluntary suspension from legal practice was rendered on 10.10.2012. The last date of submission of the application as per Anx.A-1 notification dated 30.8.2017, was upto 4.10.2017.

6. The 3rd respondent PSC had issued Anx.A-1 selection notification dated 30.8.2017, inviting applications from eligible and qualified candidates for appointment as Assistant Public Prosecutor Gr.II (APP Gr.II) in the State of Kerala. The qualifications prescribed to hold the post of APP Gr.II as per the rules and as per clause 7 of Anx. A-1 selection notification are as follows:

“i. Must be a Graduate in Law.

ii. Must be member of the Bar and must have had not less than three years of active practice in Criminal Courts.

Note:Certificate of enrollment issued by the Bar Council and 3 years experience certificate of active practice in criminal courts as on First January

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top