HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PAULY AUGUSTIN – Appellant
Versus
THE SECRETARY, PARAKKADAVU GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent
JUDGMENT
The above writ petition is filed with the following prayers:
“(i) Call for the records leading up to Ext-P6 and quash Ext-P6 by issuance of a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ order or direction.
(ii) Issue a writ of Mandamus or any other appropriate writ, order or direction to the 1st Respondent to consider the application for license, as evidenced by Ext-P5, submitted by the Petitioner as expeditiously as possible.
(iii) Declare that the petitioner is entitled to a deemed license in respect of the application filed by the petitioner for license, as evidenced by ext-P5 and direct the 1st respondent to issue necessary certificate to the said effect.
(iv) Issue a writ of mandamus or any other appropriate writ order or direction to the 1st respondent, restraining the 1st respondent from initiating the removal of the Cattles/cows from M/s Anna Poultry Farm, pending consideration of the application of renewal submitted by the Petitioner.
(v) Grant such other relief deemed fit to this Hon'ble Court.”[SIC]
2. When this writ petition came up for consideration, the counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner wants to submit a fresh application for ge
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.