JUDGMENT

Petitioner while working as Headmistress since

01.04.2017 in the Aided Secondary School under the management of the 4th respondent has approached this Court challenging the order Ext.P12 on the premise that despite having been appointed as Headmistress fulfilling the qualifications as per the Rule 44 and 44(A) of Chapter XIVA read with Rule 2 of Chapter XXXI of Kerala Education Rules and approval of the appointment was made vide order dated 27.09.2017, the 2nd respondent – Director of Public Instructions without notice cancelled the approval of appointment vide order dated 12.02.2018 Ext.P11. The aforementioned order is based on a Government Order and therefore filing of the Revision Petition and continuance thereof would be a farcical exercise.

2. On the other hand, Smt.Nisha Bose, learned Government Pleader submits that the impugned order Ext.P11 is not on the basis of any Government Order but based on the order of the District Education Officer. Revision Petition has not been decided owing to the fact that the writ petition is pending.

3. I have heard the learned counsel for the parties and apprised the paper book.

4. Concededly, as per the provisions of the Kerala Educatio