Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ
ARSHAJ S. – Appellant
Versus
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF TOURISM – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. participants objected to selection norms affecting appointment process. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 2. norms for recruitment were issued and subsequently modified. (Para 5 , 6 , 10) |
| 3. the change of selection norms was affirmed to ensure equitable representation. (Para 13 , 14 , 26) |
| 4. court concluded with remarks on procedural improvements for future selections. (Para 17 , 27) |
| 5. court ruled on the legality of arbitrary cut-off marks in recruitment. (Para 20 , 25) |
JUDGMENT
ALEXANDER THOMAS, J.
The appellants herein are aggrieved by the impugned common judgment dated 17.11.2021 rendered by the learned Single Judge, whereby WP(C).Nos.23128 & 23120 of 2021 (filed by the appellants herein) have been dismissed.
2. Heard Smt.Priya Shanavas, learned counsel appearing for the writ appellants/writ petitioners and Sri.B.Unnikrishna Kaimal, learned Senior Government Pleader appearing for the respondents in the WAs/WP(C)s.
3. The sole appellant in each of these two appeals have responded to the selection notification issued on behalf of the respondents for selection and appointment on contract basis to the post of Secretary, District Tourism Promotion Council (DTPC) in respect of the 14 districts
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
