Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ANIL K. NARENDRAN, P. G. Ajithkumar, JJ
KAKKOTTAKATH PUTHIYAPURAYIL MUHAMMAD ALI – Appellant
Versus
KAKKOTTAKATH PUTHIYARAMBATH MAHAMOOD – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction of the case and procedural context. (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. discussion on interim applications and tenant's obligations. (Para 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. analysis of landlord's requirements under the rent control act. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11) |
| 4. court's reasoning on the need for specific pleadings. (Para 12 , 13 , 14) |
| 5. supervisory jurisdiction and its limits. (Para 15 , 16) |
| 6. conclusion of the court on understanding its supervisory role. (Para 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22) |
JUDGMENT
Anil K. Narendran, J.
Since common issue is raised, these original petitions are heard together and are being disposed of by this common judgment.
2. O.P.(RC)No.97 of 2022:- The petitioners are the respondents-tenants in R.C.P.No.7 of 2016 on the file of the Rent Control Court (Munsiff), Thaliparamba, a petition filed by the respondents herein-landlords on 08.03.2016, under Sections 11 (2), 11(3), 11(4)(iii) of the Kerala Buildings (Lease and Rent Control) Act, 1965 , seeking eviction of the tenants from the petition schedule shop room bearing No.TMC XXII/53 in Thaliparamba Municipality. On receipt of notice in Ext.P1 RCP, the tenants entered appearance and filed Ext.P2 counter dated 03.11.2016.
2.1
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
