HIGH COURT OF KERALA
PAUL DAVID ALIAS POULOSE – Appellant
Versus
SIJO GEORGE – Respondent
JUDGMENT
This writ petition is filed seeking the following reliefs;
“ i) Issue a writ of certiorari or any other appropriate writ, order or direction quashing Ext.P1;
ii) Call for the records of the case and to pass appropriate orders; And iii) Grant such other reliefs as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case including costs. ”
2. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing for the 4th respondent-Panchayat. In the light of the directions being issued notice to the other respondents is dispensed with.
3. It is submitted by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner that, the petitioner is the 1st opposite party in the complaint before the Ombudsman for Local Self Government Institutions submitted by respondents 1 to 3 herein. It is submitted that without giving an opportunity to the petitioner to file his objections. Ext.P1 order has been passed by the Ombudsman. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that, the petitioner apprehends that emergent action will be taken against him by the 4th respondent, without considering his objections.
4. The learned counsel appearing for the 4th res
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.