Back
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
ALEXANDER THOMAS, VIJU ABRAHAM, JJ
UNION OF INDIA – Appellant
Versus
P.K.GEETHA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. basic case details and parties involved (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. outline of initial petitioner's prayers (Para 4 , 5) |
| 3. overview of disciplinary proceedings and rulings (Para 6 , 7 , 8) |
| 4. court's consideration of legal complexities (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. discussion of rule 27 of ccs (cca) rules (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. legal interpretations of suspension and termination (Para 13 , 14 , 15) |
| 7. distinctions between legal rules regarding suspension (Para 17 , 18) |
| 8. court's rationale on reinstatement orders (Para 19 , 20 , 22 , 23 , 25) |
| 9. final order for reinstatement and timeline (Para 26) |
JUDGMENT
Alexander Thomas, J.
The prayers in the instant Original Petition filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India are as follows:
“…....to set aside Ext.P3 Interim Order in OA No.180/00329/2021 dated 20.08.2021 of Central Administrative Tribunal, Ernakulam Bench, in the interest of justice. Sufficient time for completion of the disciplinary proceedings initiated against the respondent may kindly be granted. “
2. Heard Sri.S.Manu, learned Assistant Solicitor General of India, appearing for the petitioners in the OP/respondents in the OA and Sri.M.A.Shafik, learned counsel appearing for
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
