SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 41784

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
NASSAR, – Appellant
Versus
AKHILA, – Respondent


Advocates:
SMT.BHANU TILAK (CAVEATOR) SRI.K.S.HARIHARAPUTHRAN SMT.BHANU THILAK

J U D G M E N T

SOPHY THOMAS, J.

This appeal has been preferred by the father who was directed by the impugned judgment and decree to pay maintenance and marriage expenses to his daughter.

2. The respondent-daughter filed O.P.No.815 of 2014 against her father claiming maintenance (past and future), gold, and also marriage expenses of Rs.29,15,000/-. The Family Court, Chavara, allowed that O.P. in part directing him to pay Rs.76,000/- towards past maintenance, future maintenance at the rate of Rs.3000/- per month from 01.01.2015 to 31.12.2017, and thereafter, @ of Rs.4000/- per month till she gets married, and Rs.16,35,000/- towards anticipated marriage expenses. Aggrieved by the judgment and decree her father has come up with this appeal.

3. The facts in brief are as follows: The appellant father treated his wife and children in a cruel manner and he failed to look after them properly. So they had to seek shelter at their maternal aunt's home. A criminal case was registered against the father under Sections 498A, 324 and 308 of IPC. Knowing about the case registered against him, he left the house, taking valuable household articles, including gold ornaments of the respondent/daughter.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top