SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 41596

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
Sathish Ninan, J
ANDY – Appellant
Versus
SUNI – Respondent


Advocates:
SRI. ZUBAIR PULIKKOOL, SRI. THOMAS MATHEW NELLIM00TTIL

JUDGEMENT

Pending the appeal, the parties have arrived at a settl.ement. A joint statement has been filed to the said effect incorporating the terms of the settl.ement. A modified Award is passed in terms thereof . The joint statement filed by the parties will form part of the judgment.

Sd/-

SATHISH NINAN JUDGE sd Filed on /;.¢6.2022 BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM M.A.C.A. No.1900 of 2013 Andy and others Suni and others \.,s.

1 J~ Petitioners/ Appellants Respondents/ Respondents ±QLNTSTATEMENTFILEDBYTHLEAPPELLANTANDTHE3rdRESPONDNET lNSURAN£E COMPANY ZUBAIR PULIKOOL (Z-28) BINU.P.S.(B.678) Counsel for the Appellants ......., ±=4±1-_-j>-`i¥-,,-i BEFORE THE HON'BLE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM M.A.C.A. No.1900 of 2013 E-

1. Andy, S/o. Kannan, Aged 71 years( Died)

2. Narayani, W/O Andy,Aged 35 years,

3. Sunitha, W/o Late Rajan, Aged 44 years,

4. Nijesh, S/o Late Raj.an, Aged 28 years,

5. Nijith, S/o Late Raj.an, Aged 26 years

6. Nikhjl, S/o Late Rajan, Aged 26 years AH are residing at KurooHikandiyH Thamaslkkum EdakkudiyH House, Ponmeriparambil PO, Ayanchery Vata

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top