Back
2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 41605
HIGH COURT OF KERALA
STATE OF KERALA – Appellant
Versus
SOMASUNDARAN – Respondent
LA.App. 509 2014
The judgment established that land classification and market potential are critical in determining compensation under land acquisition law.
Headnote:
Compensation - Land Acquisition - Kerala Land Acquisition Act, 1961: Sections 54 & 23(1A) - The court analyzed land valuation and classification for compensation assessment under the Kerala Land Acquisition Act, determining that enhancements were justified based on the properties' market potential and location.
Fact of the Case:
Land Acquisition Appeals were filed by the State and claimants concerning the compensation awarded for lands acquired for widening the Kovoor-Vellimadukunnu Road. The acquired properties were claimed for enhanced compensation following a notification under the Kerala Land Acquisition Act, 1961.
Issues: The main issues were whether the classification of lands as garden land was appropriate and if the compensation awarded by the Reference Court was justifiable or needed enhancement.
Ratio Decidendi: The classification of the acquired lands as garden land was appropriate despite being registered differently, and the evidence supported a higher compensation based on their commercial potential.
Final Decision: Compensation was enhanced to Rs.4,50,000/- per cent with additional statutory benefits.
J U D G M E N T
Shoba Annamma Eapen J :
These Land Acquisition Appeals are filed under Section 54 of the Kerala Land Acquisition Act,1961 in respect of lands acquired for the purpose of widening of Kovoor-Vellimadukunnu Road, which is a project under Kozhikode City Road Improvement Project as per Notification :-2-:
dated 08.07.2010. Challenging the enhanced compensation awarded in Land Acquisition Reference cases and dissatisfied with the compensation awarded, the State as well the claimants are in appeal. LAA Nos. 63/2018, 275/2015, 300/2015, 321/2015, 345/2015, 365/2015, 367/2015, 384/2015, 433/2015, 434/2015, 435/2015, 438/2015, 439/2015, 446/2015, 447/2015, 453/2015, 462/2015, 13/2017, 28/2017, 513/2015, 51/2017, 68/2017, 105/2017, 198/2017, 278/2017, 285/2017, 793/2013, 179/2014, 180/2014, 200/2014, 210/2014, 217/2014, 111/2016, 245/2014, 250/2014, 279/2014, 294/2014, 300/2014, 301/2014, 310/2014, 194/2016, 319/2014, 196/2016, 206/2016, 209/2016, 335/2014, 338/2014, 343/2014, 356/2014, 357/2014, 234/2016, 260/2016, 266/2016, 267/2016, 275/2016, 286/2016, 287/2016, 291/2016, 292/2016, 293/2016, 421/2014, 429/2014, 454/2014, 455/2014, 459/2014, 461/2014, 462/2014, 463/2014, 468/2014, 472/2014, 362/2016, 365/2016, 370/2016, 371/2016, 497/2014, 374/2016, 504/2014, 380/2016, 381/2016, 382/2016, 507/2014, 383/2016, 509/2014, 386/2016, 515/2014, 521/2014, 526/2014, 534/2014, 412/2016, 415/2016, 416/2016, 417/2016, 420/2016, 423/2016, 424/2016, 579/2014, :-3-:
586/2014, 591/2014, 600/2014, 602/2014, 613/2014, 703/2014, 713/2014, 721/2014, 722/2014, 724/2014, 729/2014, 739/2014, 747/2014, 792/2014, 794/2014, 796/2014, 797/2014, 799/2014, 800/2014, 809/2014, 810/2014, 812/2014, 813/2014, 814/2014, 815/2014, 816/2014, 817/2014, 819/2014, 820/2014, 821/2014, 822/2014, 823/2014, 824/2014, 828/2014, 831/2014, 832/2014, 833/2014, 835/2014, 842/2014, 843/2014, 844/2014, 846/2014, 847/2014, 848/2014, 849/2014, 850/2014, 851/2014, 856/2014, 857/2014, 859/2014, 871/2014, 893/2014, 898/2014, 913/2014, 261/2016 are filed by the State challenging the enhanced compensation, Cross Objection Nos.121/2014 in LAA No.335/2014, 148/2022 in LAA No.454/2014 and 17/2022 in LAA No.429/2014 are filed by the claimants and LAA Nos..692/2013, 693/2013, 694/2013, 701/203, 702/2013, 344/2016, 397/2017 and 398/2017 are filed by the claimants, dissatisfied with the compensation awarded by the Reference Court.
2. We have heard Smt.N.Sudhadevi, learned Special Government Pleader (Land Acquisition) appearing for the State of Kerala, Sri.K.A.Salil Narayanan, the learned Counsel appearing for the :-4-:
appellants in L.A.A.Nos.701/2013,702/2013,692/2013,693/2013 and 694/2013, Sri.R.Bindu (Sasthamangalam), the learned counsel appearing for the appellants in L.A.A.No.344/2016, Sri.Vinod Singh Cherian, the learned counsel appearing for the appellants in L.A.A.Nos.397/2017 and 398/2017, Sri.A.V.M.Salahudin, the learned counsel appearing for the cross objector in C.O.No.121/2014 in L.A.A.No.335/2014 and Sri.V.N.Ramesan Nambisan, the learned counsel appearing for the cross objectors in C.O.No.148/2022 in L.A.A.No.454/2014 and C.O.17/2022 in L.A.A.No.429/2014.
3. LAA No.815 of 2014 is treated as the main case. These cases have come up in batches totaling to 162 appeals including cross objections. The properties involved in all these appeals arise out of the same notification and are adjacent properties, acquired for the very same purpose. Hence we have heard the appeals together and are being disposed of by this common judgment. LAA No.815/2014 (LAR No.82/2011) is treated as the leading case and the evidence in this case consists of oral testimony of AW1, Exts. A1 to A3, Ext.R1 to R6 and Ext.X1 and X2.
:-5-:
4. Properties in Sy.Nos.19/9,19/11,19/13,19/15,19/17,19/19, 19/21,20/5,20/7,20/9,20/12,23/15,23/16,23/18,23/22,23/26,122/4,122/5, 213/4,213/7,214/4,214/14,159/4,194/2,226/5,230/8,230/10,230/11,232/ 5,234/6,234/8,234/9,234/11, 234/12, 234/13, 234/14, 236/9, 328/11,328/13,328/17,
