SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 27858

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
P. VINOD – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF KERALA – Respondent


JUDGMENT

The petitioner contends that he is presently working as the Secretary of the Kottakkal Janakeeya Co-operative Urban Society Ltd. No.M.645, Kottakkal. His grievance in this writ petition concerns the inaction on the part of the respondents in not completing the process of appointment by issuing advice memo by the 3rd respondent and in reporting the vacancy by the 2nd respondent. He has approached this court seeking the following reliefs:

i) Issue a writ of mandamus or other writ or order or direction directing the respondents 2 to 4 to complete the process of selection and appointment pursuant to Ext.P2 to P4 orders by filling up the vacancies immediately.

2. A statement has been filed by the 2nd respondent as directed by this Court. It is stated that Ext.P1 Rank List, which is relied on by the petitioner herein, was published by the Public Service Commission (PSC) on 06.09.2011. The list, however, expired on 05.09.2014. By Ext.P2 order dated 11.02.2015, this Court had issued directions to the respondents to report 10 vacancies of Peon and 4 vacancies of Watchman in the Malappuram District Co-operative Bank to the PSC. It was ordered that “this reporting shall be provisionall

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top