SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40990

HIGH COURT OF KERALA
,
UNNIKRISHNAN THIRULI , – Appellant
Versus
CHEMANCHERY GRAMA PANCHAYATH – Respondent


J U D G M E N T

S. Manikumar, C. J.

Before the writ court, petitioners have sought for the following reliefs:-

“i) To issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, or any other Writ; Order or Direction directing the 1st & 2nd respondents to stop the implementation of proposed 'Ayachira drinking water project' by constructing a deep well in Exhibit P4 land in the 5th ward of the 1st respondent Panchayath;

ii) To issue a Writ in the nature of Prohibition prohibiting the 1st respondent Panchayath from constructing the proposed well in Exhibit P4 property for the implementation of Ayachira drinking water project;

(ii) (a) To call for the records leading to the issuance of Exhibit P12 order passed by the 2nd respondent and quash the same by issuing a Writ in the nature of Certiorari;

(ii) (b) To declare that Exhibit P12 order passed by the 2nd respondent is illegal and arbitrary and hence liable to be set aside;

iii) To issue a Writ in the nature of Mandamus, or any other Writ; Order or Direction directing the 1st & 2nd respondents to make arrangements for supplying drinking water to the needy families through the already started project of 'Jalajeevan Mission' implemented by 4th respondent from th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top