SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(KER) 40803

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE VIJU ABRAHAM WEDNESDAY, THE 10TH DAY OF AUGUST 2022 / 19TH SRAVANA, 1944 BAIL APPL. NO. 5906 OF 2022 Crime No.107/2022 of Kollam Excise Range PETITIONER/ACCUSED:

SAJEEV AGED 45 YEARS /O.SAKUNDALA, KADAVANAL PUTHUVAL HOUSE, ULIYAKOVIL, KOLLAM EAST VILLAGE, KOLLAM DISTRICT., PIN - 691019 BY ADV NIREESH MATHEW RESPONDENT/STATE:

STATE OF KERALA REPRESENTED BY PUBLIC PROSECUTOR,HIGH COURT OF KERALA, PIN - 682031 BY ADV PUBLIC PROSECUTOR SMT. SEETHA S.

THIS BAIL APPLICATION HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 10.08.2022, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:

VIJU ABRAHAM, J.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

Dated this the 10th day of August, 2022

ORDER

This is an application for anticipatory bail.

2. The petitioner is the accused in Crime No.107/2022 of Kollam Excise Range alleging commission of offence punishable under Section 57(a) of the Kerala Abkari Act . The petitioner is the salesman-cum-licensee of toddy shop No.7 of Kollam Excise Range.

3. It is submitted that the Excise Officers took sample of the toddy from the petitioner's shop and on analysis, it was found that the sample contained 8.31% v/v of ethyl alcohol, which is allegedly excess than 8.1% v/v fixed by Rule 9(2) of the Kerala Abkari Shops Disposal Rules 2002. There is no allegation that the toddy was adulterated.

4. Heard both sides.

5. Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that, that is a natural phenomenon and there is no question of adulteration. The difference in the content of ethyl alcohol is marginal. This Court as per order on B.A.No.3566 of 2018 (Annexure-4) and B.A.No.5548 of 2018 (Annexure-5) considered similar matters and granted pre-

arrest bail in such cases. Therefore, considering the facts and circumstances in the case, I am inclined to grant pre-arrest bail to the petitioner on the following conditions:

(i) Petitioner shall surrender before the investigating officer within a period of two weeks and submit himself for interrogation. Thereafter he shall execute a bond for Rs.50,000/- (Rupees fifty thousand only) with two solvent sureties each for the like sum to the satisfaction of the investigating officer. In that event, he shall be released on bail in Crime No.107/2022 of Kollam Excise Range;

(ii) The sureties shall produce documents to establish their identity and solvency. The investigating officer shall not insist on the solvency certificate, but other documents can also be perused to find out whether the sureties are solvent or not;

(iii) Petitioner shall appear before the investigating officer as and when directed in writing and co-operate with the investigation in the matter;

(iv)The petitioner shall not influence or intimidate the witnesses.

(v) The petitioner shall not involve in any other crime while on bail.

If any of the aforesaid conditions are violated, the investigating officer in Crime No.107/2022 of Kollam Excise Range may file an application before the jurisdictional Court, for cancellation of bail

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top